[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re:
- To: [email protected]
- Subject: Re:
- From: Anonymous <[email protected]>
- Date: Sun, 27 Sep 1998 03:08:06 +0200
- Comments: This message did not originate from the Sender address above.It was remailed automatically by anonymizing remailer software.Please report problems or inappropriate use to theremailer administrator at <[email protected]>.
- Sender: [email protected]
On Sun, 27 Sep 1998, Reeza! wrote:
>
> At 12:14 AM 9/27/98 +0200, Anonymous wrote:
> >[email protected] (note: AOL.COM -- LOL!) wrote:
> >>My only regret is that I wont get to watch you all burn in hell !!!
> >
> >I see. Would you mind elaborating? We are going to burn in hell
> >because...? We don't use AOL? We like our privacy? We use cryptosystems
> >that you'll never understand in your life time? Because we know how
> >to use (and create) remailers?
>
> Don't bother, it is a troll.
>
> Not a very original, or even interesting one either.
Whenever these people troll for flames here they get them one way or
another. Then it seems Merrill always tries to take the moral high ground
and show us all his bleeding heart and tell us how we should embrace the
AOL idiots and cherish them. The AOLers get triple effect that way. I don't
think Merrill ever misses a chance to defend AOL and attack anybody who
attacks them. About a week ago somebody posted a copy or parts of most AOL
postings which were sent here in the last months. Merrill ignores the part
about how the posts were classified and sends back some vague flame accusing
the author of classing posts he disagreed with as "clueless" then he quotes
the entire thing back to the list.
I don't know which is worse. At least the people flaming the AOL wimps are
funny.