[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Is it true that PGP 5.X is not secure?
>-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
>Hash: SHA1
>
>There are still rumors about that...
>ChromeDemon
>- --
>"One dead is a tragedy, thousand deads are a statistic."
> Karl Marx
>
>e-mail: [email protected]
>http://chromedemon.home.pages.de
>http://www.netcologne.de/~nc-weitzela2
>-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
>Version: PGP 5.5.5
>
>iQA/AwUBNevU0XnCsKPabtOfEQILcACfZ097WlD1pyA+2c7qv5RcyuYQJaEAoOmf
>mvg3B9F9NNv7qrHljjgC1T+B
>=J/8j
>-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
Why pay attention to ill-supported rumors? The source code is publicly
available at www.pgpi.com. If there is a security issue then it can be
critiqued with reference to the places in the source code that are the
cause of the problem. If someone has done this, I haven't been paying close
enough attention and I apologize for ranting. If not, then I would dismiss
such claims as almost certainly baseless.
Steve Bryan
Vendorsystems International
email: [email protected]
icq: 5263678
pgp fingerprint: D758 183C 8B79 B28E 6D4C 2653 E476 82E6 DA7C 9AC5