[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: propose: `cypherpunks license' (Re: Wanted: Twofish source code) (fwd)

To: Jim Choate <[email protected]>
Subject: Re: propose: `cypherpunks license' (Re: Wanted: Twofish source code) (fwd)
From: Jim Burnes <[email protected]>
Date: Thu, 8 Oct 1998 08:06:51 -0600 (MDT)
cc: Cypherpunks Distributed Remailer <[email protected]>
In-Reply-To: <[email protected]>
Sender: [email protected]

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

On Thu, 8 Oct 1998, Jim Choate wrote:

> Especialy when it is clear cypherpunks are anything but. It's almost like
> some folks believe being a cypherpunk is like joining a lodge.
> 
ssssshhhhhhh.....

BTW: I see your dues are not payed up.  I've checked the records and
the polaroid of you spitting on the cross is missing.  You can run,
but you can't hide, Mr Choate.

IlluminatusMonger

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: PGP 5.0i
Charset: noconv

iQA/AwUBNhzHEulhVGT5JbsfEQJXMQCgsJzbizFp+T/RMqmXoeF2dm08giwAniAw
NakS0BUYH9yq6+cXTCof0jcG
=ihkb
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

References:
- Re: propose: `cypherpunks license' (Re: Wanted: Twofish source code) (fwd)
  - From: Jim Choate <[email protected]>

Prev by Date: Re: propose: `cypherpunks license' (Re: Wanted: Twofish source code)
Next by Date: RE: GPL & commercial software, the critical distinction (fwd)
Prev by thread: Re: propose: `cypherpunks license' (Re: Wanted: Twofish source code) (fwd)
Next by thread: Re: propose: `cypherpunks license' (Re: Wanted: Twofish source code) (fwd)
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread