[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: fuck copyright (Re: Advertising Creepiness) (fwd)
Forwarded message:
> Date: Tue, 10 Nov 1998 13:24:23 +0000
> From: "Frank O'Dwyer" <[email protected]>
> Subject: Re: fuck copyright (Re: Advertising Creepiness) (fwd)
> Jim Choate wrote:
> > > You can make money from information provision by charging extra for
> > > up-to-date news, or by charging so little that the cost from the
> > > original provider is so low that it's not worth anyones time to
> > > redistribute it,
> >
> > That's true now, why don't we see these effects...
>
> We do. News inherently has a 'sell-by' date. The most obvious example is
> stock quotes where delayed quotes are provided for free whereas
> real-time quotes are heavily charged for. The recipients of such
> information care very much about latency, since it's possible to trade
> on any differences that may exist. There's even some research on attacks
> that simply delay packets in such networks.
Ah, true but I was addressing the last sentence about the cost being so low
nobody will charge for it.....sounds like the nuclear industry marketing
speal of the 50's....
Sorry for the confusion, I guess I should have edited the first part out
since it wasn't relevant.
____________________________________________________________________
Lawyers ask the wrong questions when they don't want
the right answers.
Scully (X-Files)
The Armadillo Group ,::////;::-. James Choate
Austin, Tx /:'///// ``::>/|/ [email protected]
www.ssz.com .', |||| `/( e\ 512-451-7087
-====~~mm-'`-```-mm --'-
--------------------------------------------------------------------