[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: IP: Clinton Wants Loophole In U.S. Free Speech Closed (fwd)
Forwarded message:
> Date: Tue, 10 Nov 1998 19:25:40 -0800 (PST)
> From: b!X <[email protected]>
> Subject: Re: IP: Clinton Wants Loophole In U.S. Free Speech Closed
> Yeah yeah all very well and good parody except that the 2nd amendment
> contains the word "well-regulated" and the 1st doesn't.
>
> (And yes I know I'm asking for a shitstorm of trouble saying that on THIS
> list of all places).
ARTICLE I.
Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion,
or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of
speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble,
and to petition the Government for a redress of grievances.
ARTICLE II.
A well regulated Militia, being necessary to the security of a
free State, the right of the people to keep and bear arms, shall not be
infringed.
I'd say that 'shall make no law' is a clear as 'shall not be infringed' and
pretty equivalent in meaning.
See, no shit-storm (they reserve that for me...;).
____________________________________________________________________
Lawyers ask the wrong questions when they don't want
the right answers.
Scully (X-Files)
The Armadillo Group ,::////;::-. James Choate
Austin, Tx /:'///// ``::>/|/ [email protected]
www.ssz.com .', |||| `/( e\ 512-451-7087
-====~~mm-'`-```-mm --'-
--------------------------------------------------------------------