[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: Matt Blaze arrested???

To: [email protected], [email protected]
Subject: Re: Matt Blaze arrested???
From: Steve Bryan <[email protected]>
Date: Wed, 2 Dec 1998 13:24:55 -0600
Cc: Matt Blaze <[email protected]>
In-Reply-To: <[email protected]>
References: Your message of "Tue, 01 Dec 1998 23:12:24 CST." <[email protected]>
Sender: [email protected]

Matt Blaze wrote:

>I'm afraid you're confused.  Whoever this report was about, it
>wasn't me:
>...

Not a important question but isn't this the sort of message that would
benefit most from a PGP signature? I checked on the certserver and it did
locate a 512 bit key RSA key from 1993. I don't routinely sign or encrypt
my email but I remain curious about decisions others make. In a program on
NPR a few years ago I recall a few luminaries were ardently discussing the
issues involved in encryption but when asked late in the program how they
used encrryption themselves they all quickly said that it was just too
cumbersome.

Steve Bryan
Vendorsystems International
email: [email protected]
icq: 5263678
pgp fingerprint: D758 183C 8B79 B28E 6D4C  2653 E476 82E6 DA7C 9AC5

References:
- Matt Blaze arrested???
  - From: "jim finder" <[email protected]>
- Re: Matt Blaze arrested???
  - From: Matt Blaze <[email protected]>

Prev by Date: Re: "Export" controls
Next by Date: Y2K and Atlas
Prev by thread: Re: Matt Blaze arrested???
Next by thread: Re: Matt Blaze arrested???
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread