[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Fwd: Anne McLellan's voters reject gun registration...


==================BEGIN FORWARDED MESSAGE==================
>Received: from bernie.compusmart.ab.ca (bernie.compusmart.ab.ca 
[199.185.131.34])
>	by cti13.citenet.net (8.9.1/8.9.1) with ESMTP id NAA22703
>	for <[email protected]>; Tue, 15 Dec 1998 13:02:25 -0500 (EST)
>Received: from remote322.compusmart.ab.ca ([206.75.84.147]:1035 "EHLO 
compusmart.ab.ca") by mail.compusmart.ab.ca with ESMTP id <409327-12752>; Tue, 
15 Dec 1998 10:52:54 -0700
>Message-ID: <[email protected]>
>Date: 	Tue, 15 Dec 1998 10:53:20 -0700
>From: Peter Kearns <[email protected]>
>Organization: KEARNS & McMURCHY
>X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.04 [en] (Win95; I)
>MIME-Version: 1.0
>To: Canadian Firearms Digest <[email protected]>,
>        "Anne Mclellan (Parliament)" <[email protected]>,
>        Bernard Johnston <[email protected]>,
>        Bob Burgess <[email protected]>, Bob Lickacz <[email protected]>,
>        Brad Browne <[email protected]>,
>        Dale Blue <[email protected]>,
>        David Tomlinson <[email protected]>,
>        Don Davies <[email protected]>,
>        Donna Ferollie <[email protected]>,
>        Frank Szojka <[email protected]>,
>        Frank Williamson <[email protected]>,
>        Garry Breitkreutz <[email protected]>,
>        Gordon Hitchen <[email protected]>,
>        Jean-Francois Avon <[email protected]>,
>        Jim Hinter <[email protected]>,
>        "John St. Amour" <[email protected]>,
>        LE QUEBECOIS LIBRE <[email protected]>,
>        Manuel De La Paz <[email protected]>,
>        Mark Hughes <[email protected]>,
>        Pierre Bourque <[email protected]>,
>        Lorne Gunter <[email protected]>,
>        Shafer Parker <[email protected]>,
>        Pat & Mike Ryan <[email protected]>,
>        Paul Bennett <[email protected]>,
>        Paul Rogan <[email protected]>, Peekay <[email protected]>,
>        Peter Cronhelm <[email protected]>,
>        Peter Figol <[email protected]>, Ken Epp <[email protected]>,
>        Preston Manning <[email protected]>,
>        Jack Ramsay <[email protected]>, Deb Grey <[email protected]>,
>        Monty Solberg <[email protected]>,
>        Raheem Jaffer <[email protected]>,
>        "Robin Leech \"SPIDERMAN\"" <[email protected]>,
>        Tony Bernardo <[email protected]>
>Subject: Anne McLellan's voters reject gun registration...
>Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
>Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
>X-UIDL: ddaaa1595eab8ceea7515c82b013fcca
>

"The Edmonton Examiner" a local community newspaper, ran an
editorial entitled "Gun lobby has a point."  In it they
accused the "pro-gun" faction of posturing and paranoia, but
then went on to say the so called "lobby" is correct in it's
assessment of the registry.  The paper  said, "the
government has failed to show how gun registration will
reduce crime, which is the sole reason for registration."  

	The newspaper also asked how would knowing that people own
rifles deter crimes, while "the new law does nothing to
deter the easy access to guns smuggled in from the U.S." 
Another statement follows, "and of course the criminal
element has no interest in registering guns."  The editor
makes one last telling remark, "So exactly what is the
point? Essentially, it is to gather information.  All
governments love information, the more the better.  But
there is no proof at all that registering guns deters
criminal activity."

	Sounds like an editor sounding off..... Right?   What
follows indicates the writer likes to do a little
investigative journalism.... The editor then conducted a
telephone poll asking the question "ARE YOU IN FAVOUR OF THE
GOVERNMENTS GUN REGISTRY PROGRAM?  (Remember folks, the
constituents of "Idle Annie" had their say in this poll.) 
The results were 76%  AGAINST the registration program with
24% in favour..... Oh dear, Annie..... You'd better hope
they change their minds come election time......  

	Comments from those opposed to the registry, "I have never
owned a gun, but I resent this program which smacks of a
police state."  Another said, "I have yet to undertstand how
having the gun registered that killed those students in
Montreal registered would have prevented that terrible
deed." The last and most telling,  "It is simply a way to
enable the confiscation of firearms in order to prevent any
insurrection or revolt against a government that may be
imposing oppressive measures."

	The usual comments equating registering cars and guns, and
the "only one life" bleat came from the 24% who actually
liked the registry.  One even said "Gun owners have to wait
hours to get their guns, instead of minutes.  Get over it
you big whiny crybabies."  (Kinda makes you question the
maturity of that one!)

	The polls are turning in our favour, and they are doing so
because we are educating the public.  The more they know
about the registration process and the costs, the less they
like the idea.  We have accomplished this without breaking
any laws, and without the need to indulge in civil
disobedience.  If we break (even unjust) laws and engage in
publicised acts of civil disobedience then we will lose. 
The newsmedia will then (rightly) portray us as a bunch of
right wing fanatics, and elements of the lunatic fringe. 
The NFA has proved we can be heard, and that the public is
seeing things our way without the need to engage in silly
demonstrations.  Let's see how far we can go within the law,
during the next four years.
regards,
Peter Kearns
NFA Communications

Simon says:  "Well what about it Annie?  What do your spin
doctors have to say about a poll that included the people
who voted in the last election in Edmonton West?  (Weren't
you elected to represent the views of the people who voted
for you?)...........


===================END FORWARDED MESSAGE===================