[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: if this is RC4
On Sep 15, 3:06pm, Perry E. Metzger wrote:
> > Assuming for the moment that alleged-RC4 came from the keyboard of Ron
> > Rivest,
> Well, from his mind -- its probably a reverse engineering job. It
> looks like it may be interoperable, which would imply that its real...
If it is, then the person who did it has gone to a lot of trouble to make
the source layout and coding style very similar to the publicly available
MD sources. Compare them and you'll see what I mean. One of the original
reasons I thought that this was a fake was the similarity (adds credibility),
but when it was verified I began to think that this is, in fact, the real
from RSADSI. I don't think that this is a reverse engineering job, because
I can't see any motive for anyone to put the work into making the code look
> Hard to tell. Its remarkably simple -- the simplest cypher I've seen
> in some time. It obvioously needs to be studied in detail. The
> possible excitement comes from its speed...
I think that we must bear in mind that most of us are familiar with block
ciphers, and that there aren't a lot of stream ciphers out there which are
widely used right now. The only others I know of are the various LFSR's
(which are pretty simple themselves), and that alleged early prototype
A5 (which was itself a group of LSFR's too).