[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: National Research Council
Mr. Karn said:
/From: Phil Karn <[email protected]>
/To: [email protected]
/>Is it me or are there a disproportionate amount of legal/government/military/
/>types on this list? Keeping this in mind, do you really think any of our
/>comments will go anywhere but in the old circular file?
/My thoughts exactly. The committee's classification/clearance policy
/was undoubtedly intended to skew its membership much more than to
/protect any legitimate government secret. After all, they're supposed
/to be discussing openly available civilian encryption technologies.
/Funny how the most obvious, no-brainer public policy questions always
/seem to generate the most controversy...
And what, pray tell, is per se wrong with "legal types"?
Why do you think Bollinger, Hellman, Neumann, Patel are knee-jerk
non-liberals? (Or even Civiletti for that matter, he's reasonable).
OK there are no *radicals* but what do you expect from the establishment?
I think you will get a respectful hearing if you make sensible comments.
I have no doubt that you personallly will do the latter.