[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Returned mail: User unknown
----- Transcript of session follows -----
While talking to toad.com:
>>> RCPT To:<[email protected]>
<<< 550 <[email protected]>... User unknown
550 [email protected]... User unknown
----- Unsent message follows -----
Received: by sun.Panix.Com id AA00914
(5.65c/IDA-1.4.4 for [email protected]); Sat, 17 Apr 1993 18:11:23 -0400
Received: by sun.Panix.Com id AA29602
(5.65c/IDA-1.4.4 for habs); Sat, 17 Apr 1993 17:42:12 -0400
Date: Sat, 17 Apr 1993 17:42:12 -0400
From: Mail Delivery Subsystem <MAILER-DAEMON>
Message-Id: <[email protected]>
To: habs
Subject: Returned mail: User unknown
Sender: habs
----- Transcript of session follows -----
While talking to toad.com:
>>> RCPT To:<[email protected]>
<<< 550 <[email protected]>... User unknown
550 [email protected]... User unknown
----- Unsent message follows -----
Received: by sun.Panix.Com id AA29600
(5.65c/IDA-1.4.4 for [email protected]); Sat, 17 Apr 1993 17:42:12 -0400
From: Harry Shapiro <habs>
Message-Id: <[email protected]>
Subject: PGP & RSA -> Legal
To: [email protected], [email protected] (Harry Shapiro)
Date: Sat, 17 Apr 1993 17:42:11 -0400 (EDT)
Reply-To: habs
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Length: 698
I recall at some point that RSA put something out on the net
which allowed anyone to use the "patents or source code" for
non-commercial use.
Do I remember correctly? (I replied to the announcement)
If I am remembering correctly, would that give me a defacto
licensing of PGP for con-commercial use?
The reason I bring this up is that if the feds crack down,
they many decide to "help" RSA by legally fighting PGP users.
Which why it would be in our interest to legally (patent-wise,
despite how you feel about RSA, etc.) use PGP.
--
Harry Shapiro [email protected]
List Administrator of the Extropy Institute Mailing List
Private Communication for the Extropian Community since 1991