[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Chained remails
- To: [email protected]
- Subject: Re: Chained remails
- From: [email protected]
- Date: Thu, 24 Jun 93 22:03:54 -0700
- Comments: This message is NOT from the person listed in the Fromline. It is from an automated software remailing service operating atthat address. Please report problem mail to <[email protected]>.
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
M. Stirner, <[email protected]>, writes:
> Gee, am I amazed. An anonymous post claims to have been routed via
> SIXTEEN (presumably cypherpunks) remailers. Using the posted list of
> "active" cypherpunks remailers & the revised remailer manual, I have
> been unable to get simple
>
> To: [email protected]
>
> ::
> Request-Remailing-To:
>
> test messages to run through any but a couple (9, 10 & 12 I believe). I
> have _never_ been able to get any of the "insects @ Berkeley" remailers
> to go with the standard syntax...or otherwise.
The problem may be the Fidonet addressing. Many times I have tried to
send mail to people with mailing addresses like M's, and not had the
mail get through. I don't know what the rules are but perhaps some systems
can get it and some can't.
I'd suggest to M. that he take one of the systems that does respond to his
remailing requests, and have that be the LAST one in a chain of two. So,
he could send to, say, [email protected], and follow that with
[email protected]. Perhaps this would get through:
To: [email protected]
::
Request-Remailing-To: [email protected]
::
Request-Remailing-To: [email protected]
Even if cicada can't mail to him, perhaps it can mail to rosebud which can
then mail to Fido.
Hal Finney
[email protected]
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
iQCVAgUBLCpauqgTA69YIUw3AQEoYwP/TUiqRu8OHgA61WM6HVtrZ/CE37hXjVY7
WM7sN+RkUlO+1QTeZKi2r0gEy/CGKnZiMTbEHYHcWK486tIbDZIDXqdRoZigEemH
5jwComG9Vv6wPMFyhcLQkejgSX7nN0UU4TGzdOOq2kRyiplTysLd+1pqPyUzpsbU
qR9lO8ZjVPY=
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----