[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: Clipper specifics



I said:
> Their spokesagency, NIST, has said that it will be illegal to encrypt
> on top of Skipjack or to mung the LEEF.

Checking the relevant document again, I think this is wrong:
--------------------
 Federal Information Processing Standards Publication XX
 1993 XX
 Announcing the Escrowed Encryption Standard (EES)

[blah blah]

The security equipment shall ensure that the LEAF is transmitted 
in such a manner that the LEAF and ciphertext may be decrypted 
with legal authorization. No additional encryption or modification 
of the LEAF is permitted.

[...]
--------------------

I remembered this text out of context.  Correctly interpreted, it
looks like it's just a specification for devices implementing the
(voluntary, natch) Escrowed Encryption Standard.  Sorry about that. 

   Eli   [email protected]