[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [email protected] is NOT a tentacle!!!

To: [email protected]
Subject: Re: [email protected] is NOT a tentacle!!!
From: [email protected] (Paul Ferguson)
Date: Wed, 12 Jan 1994 13:00:51 -0500 (EST)
Cc: [email protected]
In-Reply-To: <[email protected]> from "[email protected]" at Jan 12, 94 09:20:18 am


futor writes -

> > This feels like Detweiler spoofing again.
> > Anyone else get that feeling?
> 
> It's not.  I recognize:
> 
> >> ------ Legalize:          >--<o | I confess to an unatural, and abnormal .
> >> \    /  :-)-~             o>--< | act I have programmed a computer.     . .
> >>  \  / You are ~1,000,000,000,000,000 .1ms NAND gates have a nice day.  . . .
> >>   \/ The true theory of everything will run on a finite turing machine. . . .

Ah, but keep in mind that whoever is ranting in the newsgroups (an12070)
has also used .signature blocks used by other _real_ people. This
signifies nothing.

- Paul

References:
- Re: [email protected] is NOT a tentacle!!!
  - From: [email protected]

Prev by Date: Re: Public key encryption, income tax and government
Next by Date: Public key encryption, in
Prev by thread: Re: [email protected] is NOT a tentacle!!!
Next by thread: Re: [email protected] is NOT a tentacle!!! (fwd)
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread