[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Detweiler abuse again
> (As an aside: how do these gateways take the heat? Should I suggest to
> those complaining to me that my system is intended for email, not
> usenet, anonymity, and that they should direct their complaints to the
> mail-to-news gateways which are the "real" cause of the problem?
> Is this tactic likely to be politically effective?)
No, and it would probably backfire. If the mail-to-usenet gateways get
abused, the administrators of the gates will probably start blocking
incoming mail, as CMU and Berkeley have done.
(The CMU gateway is [email protected] You can
try it and see what results you get.)
It might be more effective if you bounced messages from detweiler back
to him, CC: postmaster with a notice saying "Due to repeated abuses of
this email service, messages from [email protected] are no
longed accepted. Unsent message follows: