[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: Detweiler blocking

To: [email protected]
Subject: Re: Detweiler blocking
From: [email protected] (Jim Wilson (VA))
Date: Fri, 18 Feb 94 7:23:39 HST
Cc: [email protected]
In-Reply-To: <[email protected]>; from "Perry E. Metzger" at Feb 16, 94 9:33 pm

While I personally have no bitch with LD's posts (I just delete 99% of them)
it would seem that a service provider, like a restaurant, can say

  "We reserve the right to refuse service to anyone"

It's a free country - (or at least buyable) - the remailer operators should
have a right to deny service to anyone they care to.  If the person they
deny service to doesn't like it, they can use a different remailer.  Or
start their own remailer.

References:
- Re: Detweiler blocking
  - From: "Perry E. Metzger" <[email protected]>

Prev by Date: Re: killfiles
Next by Date: Re: Enuf is enuf!
Prev by thread: Re: Detweiler blocking
Next by thread: Re: Detweiler blocking
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread