[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: standard for stegonography?





On Mon, 28 Feb 1994, Matthew Gream wrote:

> 
> How about something like small random pad, maybe one octet, then a
> signature (such as "***Begin ...") with this header information being
> encrypted via IDEA CFB. You could also include a more structured header
> after this, ie. an ID for the software that created it, so the correct
> demodulation technique can be applied, or at least warned about if not
> available.
> 
> With this type of method, unless you can pre-supply the key, the stego
> header should look like noise.
> 
> Matthew.
> -- 
> Matthew Gream. ph: (02)-821-2043. [email protected].
> PGPMail and brown paperbags accepted. - Non Servatum -
>   ''weirdo's make the world go around'' - A.Watts
> 


If you're using one-time pads, why use PGP?  _Public_ Key Cryptography...?



Sergey