[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: "ordinary public"
> [email protected] writes:
> > It's not a good idea to take this debate to the ordinary public...
> > Time readers, yes...
>
> Well, if "Time readers" aren't the ordinary public, then I give up.
Well, they're a subset of the ordinary public that both reads and
has some interest in news issues, but that's a reasonably good start.
The folks who only watch TV are a bit different audience,
and the folks who don't care about news are less likely to vote...