[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: Nature of RSA's patent

To: [email protected]
Subject: Re: Nature of RSA's patent
From: Phil Karn <[email protected]>
Date: Mon, 14 Mar 1994 12:26:22 -0800
Cc: [email protected], [email protected]
In-Reply-To: <[email protected]> (message from Mike Godwin on Mon, 14 Mar 1994 14:32:38 -0500 (EST))
Sender: [email protected]

Why should my incoming PGP-encrypted communications be automatically considered
"infringing products", since I've got a copy of ViaCrypt PGP that was
produced under license from Public Key Partners?

Phil

Follow-Ups:
- Re: Nature of RSA's patent
  - From: Mike Godwin <[email protected]>

References:
- Re: Nature of RSA's patent
  - From: Mike Godwin <[email protected]>

Prev by Date: Re: spyproofing your house/work building
Next by Date: Books, Loompanics, and other weird stuff
Prev by thread: Re: Nature of RSA's patent
Next by thread: Re: Nature of RSA's patent
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread