[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Detweilering (was Re: Positive uses for PGP)



-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----

> On Sun, 3 Apr 1994, Mike McNally wrote:

> > I'm not Detweilering; I speak of the ostensible use of the signature
> > chain.)

> Detweilering?

> Sounds like an entry we need to get put into future versions of a Jargon 
> File.

Maybe it could be added to the FAQ.  You know, the one Detweiler wrote.

(:-)

	John E. Kreznar		| Relations among people to be by
	[email protected]	| mutual consent, or not at all.

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: 2.3a

iQCVAgUBLZ9COcDhz44ugybJAQH9OQP/TjJukjUH+PYP87Ims5OonokOlMVCSX8f
QekhHf4XPSgODPJltFM6Z7QnjOwgRwUwD5TxwkPlAcol2c11/OtHIwFhei3jsATW
H66KaQFr3LtGWMsdwEFTApRScr4CFSskzwsqMp1hXJRIZRNuy1qVKRBgufwd13sF
qJtfwd9278Q=
=NcUs
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----