[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: PGP 2.5 & Remailers

To: David Merriman <[email protected]>
Subject: Re: PGP 2.5 & Remailers
From: Derek Atkins <[email protected]>
Date: Sun, 15 May 94 06:39:35 EDT
Cc: [email protected] (cypherpunks)
In-Reply-To: Your message of Fri, 13 May 94 21:02:09 -0500. <[email protected]>
Sender: [email protected]

> I was just wondering if there was going to be any hacking done to the anon
> remailers to allow PGP 2.5 usage, as well as PGP 2.3.  If so, how would
> the headers change (if any), other than the obvious version numbers?  Can
> we expect to see anouncements by various remailers advising as to whether
> they'll be supporting v2.5?

No hacking necessary.  Things should be totally compatible, so long
as servers are running at least 2.3a; although 2.5 is recommended. :-)

They are compatible.

-derek

References:
- PGP 2.5 & Remailers
  - From: David Merriman <[email protected]>

Prev by Date: PGP 2.5 Warning
Next by Date: Re: Message Haven explanation
Prev by thread: PGP 2.5 & Remailers
Next by thread: rec.guns Cross-Post
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread