Re: PGP 2.6 and the future

[allan@elvis.tamu.edu (Allan Bailey)]

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----

"Perry E. Metzger" writes:
>
>Allan Bailey says:
>> I'm willing to wager that this 2.6 and maybe 2.5 versions are 
>> hacked by the NSA to put in their spiffy key-escrowed backdoor.
>
>How much are you willing to wager? I'll take the bet at any size.
>

WAit!  Let me correct that statement before I lose my shirt.

I'm willing to wager that 2.6 (and maybe 2.5) MIT'd PGP versions
are hacked by the NSA to put in a backdoor.
                                ^^^^^^^^^^ (emphasis added.)

I'll bet you a C-note, Perry.

Now how do you propose to prove or disprove this?

- -- 
Allan Bailey, allan@elvis.tamu.edu          | "Freedom is not free."
Infinite Diversity in Infinite Combinations | allan.bailey@tamu.edu
Esperanto: MondLingvo, lingvo internacia.


-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: 2.3a

iQCVAgUBLdfTok19fA0AcDy9AQHKiwP/dtC8MQ40g0mnGrD2gnxDJVG+gtxl4enB
u35Gv0Yt7S5IVks+TJoyfv4SGT8tyjDrBbY7+ibOkM38VDsHPpg4IWQlM9I449EZ
9XgvCK5RvMVfBBpruRbQGCjz7b09MsAbUK3R/jerbYS7HwUkMZq7WBk269xDWBy6
sC6eHZGBN+k=
=nh85
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----


PS:  just make make sure we agree on the definition of "C-note":

      C-note == $100.00 US