[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: quantum Computing

To: [email protected] (Mike McNally)
Subject: Re: quantum Computing
From: Rick Busdiecker <[email protected]>
Date: Wed, 18 May 1994 13:56:12 -0400
Cc: [email protected]
In-Reply-To: Your message of "Wed, 18 May 1994 12:46:46 CDT." <[email protected]>
Organization: Lehman Brothers Inc.
Reply-To: Rick Busdiecker <[email protected]>
Sender: [email protected]

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----

    Date: Wed, 18 May 94 12:46:46 CDT
    From: [email protected] (Mike McNally)
    
    While we're being picky, I'll point out that (unless I'm wrong of
    course) it's not really an NFA, but a non-deterministic Turing
    machine (an "NTM"?) that's the automaton at issue here.

No, NFA is acceptable and correct, it's Non-determinisic Finite
Automaton.  A non-deterministic Turing machine is a perfectly
reasonable example, however.

			Rick

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: 2.3a

iQCVAgUBLdpWthaZNKPPNj41AQEttwQAnCs9sZ+fV9BhCMf/PXyM6w59NjIc8ZwF
vVL394XfzqvQKUzwK8pV04d5YMusfgbVibj+IuEaAEkn9qMYkaoX9XL65tzhPf8N
6bilBkRVIuCmLye9J0vpylouqS7bAakF7Htu06EDOzTQArBXEWUaBGkaH5P+m8xu
xQLMS1RmmKk=
=H5dW
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

Follow-Ups:
- Re: quantum Computing
  - From: [email protected] (Mike McNally)
- Re: quantum Computing
  - From: "Perry E. Metzger" <[email protected]>

References:
- Re: quantum Computing
  - From: [email protected] (Mike McNally)

Prev by Date: Re: quantum Computing
Next by Date: Re: quantum Computing
Prev by thread: Re: quantum Computing
Next by thread: Re: quantum Computing
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread