[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: PGP 2.5 / PGP 2.6

>On Wed, 18 May 1994, Dave Otto wrote:

>MIT's press release on 2.6 also mentions bugs in 2.5 that have been 
>pointed out to them. I'm all for liberating 2.5 from MIT but we need to 
>fix the bugs in it that they fixed in (or are fixing in) 2.6.

If this is done successfully, it might be a good idea to name it
PGP 2.7 for obvious reasons.