Re: Patent infringement (fwd)

[pckizer@tamu.edu (Philip Kizer)]

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----

>  - Possession of a 2.3a key does not necessarily constitute inducement to
>    infringe the patent.  Perfectly legal programs exist which will work very
>    well with a 2.3a key (versions 2.4 and up).  So by possessing a key

                                        ^^^^^^ (as long as WE code it that way)

>    labelled 2.3a you are not inducing others to violate anyone's patents.

Especially when considering those not in the United States...RSA patent
(however valid/invalid) need not apply; and you're not (necessarily)
contributing to "inducement" since that's what's necessary to communicate
with those out of the country.


>  - In any case, Sternlight does not have any standing in making this charge.
>    He is not a lawyer and is not affiliated with RSADSI in any way.  At best
>    his reports are second- or third-hand interpretations of his understanding
>    of RSADSI's position.  Unless or until the patent holder speaks directly
>    to make these charges, there is no need to respond.

Like (m)any of us can make an official statement on that.

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: 2.4

iQCVAgUBLduSoLZspOMRmJBhAQE9ZAP+OEU1HUfzY/oPZFq89pMc5EWdt02jGH+5
nXhd4Rfq79DFGbe1qxXCx+6dsW/+r05olUuP6o7kjaWjDkp4JzHIXJTdNLRUhA9L
6ahOt7Vx1emHYShWI2NiLLY1Fb5i7a6b6xSZm5hBZYSYYrLCM3nx930IzJ+8XhfP
CLK7dTcjVtg=
=nKxz
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

"Relying on the government to protect your privacy is like asking a peeping
tom to install your window blinds." -John Perry Barlow, EFF co-founder