[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: PGP 2.6 is dangerous in the long term ?

To: [email protected]
Subject: Re: PGP 2.6 is dangerous in the long term ?
From: nelson@crynwr (Russell Nelson)
Date: Wed, 25 May 94 14:38 EDT
In-Reply-To: <199405251438.AA04385@xtropia> ([email protected])
Sender: [email protected]

   Date: Wed, 25 May 1994 07:38:05 -0700
   From: [email protected]

   Ezekial Palmer says:

   The GNU copyleft is supposed to disallow a lot of for-profit uses.

I think the word you're looking for is "proprietary".  I earn a living
from my commercial, for-profit, GPL'ed collection of packet drivers.
No reason why anyone can't do the same with PGP, absent stupid
software patents and stupid export restrictions.  There's a LOT of
room for adding value to PGP.

References:
- Re: PGP 2.6 is dangerous in the long term ?
  - From: [email protected]

Prev by Date: Re: Patentability (was Graph
Next by Date: Re: Canadian site
Prev by thread: Re: PGP 2.6 is dangerous in the long term ?
Next by thread: Re: PGP 2.6 is dangerous in the long term ?
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread