[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Unicorn vs....
Mike Duvos scripsit
> > I have to support Black Unicorn's use of the courts.
> > Really, what choices were available?
> > So, I, for one, think Black Unicorn took the best and most
> > reasonable approach. I'd be very interested in which course
> > (or some other undefined course I didn't think of) that
> > the anarchists feel would be reasonable...
> Let's see. I didn't read the thread in question but am reasonably
> familiar with the unsavory debating tactics of Mr. Tmp from other
> As I understand it, Mr. Unicorn and Mr. Tmp, their true identities safely
> concealed behind their respective handles, engaged in a minor flame war
> and major ass-kicking contest related to the topics of crypto, privacy,
> and nasty authoritarian governments. Mr. Tmp, following his usual modus
> operandi, engaged in some reasonably clever hand-waving, out-of-context
> quoting, misdirection, and misrepresentation at the expense of a number
> of people, including Mr. Unicorn.
> All this would have been water under the bridge were it not for the fact
> that Mr. Unicorn, who is wont to travel in circles considerably more
> conservative than most of his political writings, inadvertantly disclosed
> his identity in the thread while showing a friend how to use Usenet.
> Certainly this blunder was no fault of Mr. Tmp.
> Ultimately, as a consequence of this leak, certain business associates of
> Mr. Unicorn, with no knowlege of Usenet or the context of the discussion,
> were exposed to portions of it and the identity of Mr. Unicorn was
> disclosed. Again no fault of Mr. Tmp.
> Said business associates, being relatively anal upper-class European
> types with a great respect for authority, were singularly unamused by
> Mr. Unicorn's political views and the even worse things falsely
> attributed to him by Mr. Tmp in the heat of discussion. Mr. Unicorn
> became worried that his business might suffer as a consequence. Since I
> personally believe that one should not discriminate in doing business
> based on someones political beliefs, I would certainly characterize this
> as a moral failure on the part of Mr. Unicorn's business associates, and
> not the fault of Mr. Tmp.
> Finally, Mr. Unicorn, mustering all the legal and financial resources at
> his disposal, threatens to skewer Mr. Tmp for alleged libel, and Mr. Tmp,
> lacking similar resources and unable to risk a courtroom defeat, is forced
> to go on Usenet and publicly eat you-know-what with a large wooden spoon.
> Since Mr. Tmp is not well-liked in the Cypherpunk community, response to
> this sorted tale consists mostly of praise for Mr. Unicorn, and silence
> by those who might have been critical, but who don't want Mr. Unicorn to
> treat them the same way.
> I don't think there are any heros in this story. I think it is a dark
> day for freedom of expression in general and Usenet in particular.
> In the past, I have engaged in lots of heated discussions on many
> hot-button topics, on Usenet and in many other forums, sometimes under my
> own name, and occasionally under a pseudonym. I have been called many
> vile things along the way, and have had my views on occasion
> misrepresented far more cleverly than Mr. Tmp could imagine or articulate.
> Nonetheless, if I found myself losing work because an unpopular view of
> mine came to light, filing a lawsuit against another Usenet poster would
> be just about the last thing I would think of doing. Particularly if the
> discussion took place under a pseudonym and I was the person who had
> broken my own anonymity.
> Antics like this threaten the entire concept of Usenet as a
> reputation-based cooperative anarchy. The solution to Mr. Tmp is to put
> him in your killfile, not sue him into submission.
> Mike Duvos $ PGP 2.6 Public Key available $
> [email protected] $ via Finger. $
073BB885A786F666 nemo repente fuit turpissimus - potestas scientiae in usu est
6E6D4506F6EDBC17 quaere verum ad infinitum, loquitur sub rosa - wichtig!