[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
No Subject
> From: Anthony Garcia <[email protected]>
> P.S. Larry, if you're still lurking around here: the "Yay Sedition!" and
> "Yay Tax Evasion!" are especially for *yoooouuu*.
funny think about garcia, his first time ever post on c'punx was about
larry too...... strange times indeed when a newbie bursts on the scene
knowing all about us
Date: Wed, 19 Jan 1994 23:18:22 -0600
From: Anthony Garcia <[email protected]>
Message-Id: <[email protected]>
Cc: [email protected]
Subject: Detweiler's SQUISH broadcast: can remailers filter out addressee?
I'm not familiar with anonymous remailer internals. Would it be cheap
in terms of hack-time to add the capability for an anonymous remailer
to maintain a list of addresses (or address regexp's) which do not
wish to receive anonymous remailed messages?
That way, if Detweiler is sending unwanted msgs to say,
"[email protected]" via an anonymous remailer, and the readers of
chess-fans complained to the (hopefully responsive) remailer operator,
the remailer operator could add the "chess-fans" address to a "don't-
remail-to-these-folks" list so that the nice readers of chess-fans can
read mail in peace.
However, if the "Don't-mail-to-these-folks" list gets too long, it
would probably degrade remailer performance... sigh. (remailer authors:
is this a correct assumption?)
(Perhaps the "don't-mail" addresses could be tagged with amount of time
somebody last attempted them; addresses that no one's attempted to
hit in say, a year, could be expired.)
-Anthony Garcia
[email protected]
NeoSoft is a commercial access provider, not my employer. (They didn't
demand identity verification when I signed up, either. Yay, capitalism!)
P.S. Larry: I didn't make the "tentacle" list in your SQUISH post? I
feel slighted! Please correct in the next version.