[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Lawsuits Against PKP
Date: Mon, 1 Aug 1994 08:09:30 -0700
From: Hal <[email protected]>
[email protected] (Bruce Schneier) writes:
>Schlafly v. Public Key Partners, C-94-20512-SW, July 27, 1994, San Jose.
>It alleges that almost all of the PKP patent claims are invalid and
>unenforceable.
That makes my day. The name Schlafly sounds familiar (I don't mean
Phyllis). Roger? Does anyone know a crypto person with this name?
Well, FWIW, the woman who spends most of the year traveling around the
country telling other women to stay home has gained at least a slight
interest in crypto lately.
The Phyllis Schlafly Report <[email protected]> recently posted an
announcement taking an anti-Clipper position and referring to an
online `report' that they've prepared concerning Clipper. I didn't
see anything to indicate that she'd be interested in going after PKP
however, so Roger is probably a better guess.
I have no idea whether Roger is her son or how similar their political
ideas are.
Rick