[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

RE: 'Anon' Fake

To: [email protected]
Subject: RE: 'Anon' Fake
From: [email protected]
Date: Tue, 2 Aug 1994 20:46:49 -0700
Comments: This message is NOT from the person listed in the Fromline. It is from an automated software remailing service operating atthat address. Please report problem mail to <[email protected]>.
Sender: [email protected]

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----

> The mechanism employed was obvious and simple -- someone subscribed an
> anXXX address to the list. Anyone looking at the subscription list can
> tell that, on their own. This technique has been used before.

Is there any evidence to link this anxxxx person to the "tuna 
fish" spam?  Given the fact that by doing a "who cypherpunks" 
will yield anyone, including various TLAs a list of potential 
"troublemakers" (by their standards), might this subscriber 
merely be trying to protect his real identity from prying eyes?  
Actually, I had thought of doing so myself, but didn't want to 
over-burden Julf's server with such a high volume of mail, plus 
having the mesages get cut off whenever a dashed line was 
encountered.

FWIW, other list servers have a "set conceal" option which, upon 
request, keeps a person's address from becoming public through 
the "who" command.

- -- Diogenes

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: 2.6

iQCVAgUBLj70d+Rsd2rRFQ1JAQFSlwP+NkXJSaKlUKuFnLhzHWjGxd6X+prUlPiV
NsKGBXON6ATKGTvcCE8IG+A17MwkxNi4PxnOvmdCyyI+940Rz9uDmZo8qSW5EWip
7oQ/mEFGnxRY7wkw+99QHpASxBE/9nJSvuCM0AwGfZ5/0rMSUE1t2M52PAfZcELa
9G+cEM9GiPM=
=tzW7
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

Prev by Date: Re: In the news...
Next by Date: Re: Children and the Net
Prev by thread: Attention Bay Area (and West Coast?) Cypherpunks
Next by thread: RE: Uniforms, Authority, and 'System X'
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread