[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
<null> Re: Remailer ideas (Was: Re: Latency vs. Reordering)
- To: [email protected]
- Subject: <null>
- Subject: Re: Remailer ideas (Was: Re: Latency vs. Reordering)
- From: [email protected] (An0nYm0Us UsEr)
- Date: Sun, 7 Aug 1994 01:04:25 +0200
- Comment-1: This message did not originate from the above address.
- Comment-2: It was automatically remailed by an anonymous mail service.
- Comment-3: Please report inappropriate use to <[email protected]>
- Organization: Global Anonymous Remail Services Ltd.
- Sender: [email protected]
Jim Dixon writes:
>Commercial remailers would probably be very concerned with legal
>issues, both criminal (pornography, etc) and non-criminal (copyright
>violations).
Those commercial remailers probably will be located around the world,
so pornography could be send by using an "offshore" [=non-american]
remailer as last link in the chain.
The jurisdiction where this remailer could be located, preferably
shouldn't care about pornografy. [Holland, Scandinavia ?]
>--
>Jim Dixon