[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: Remailer ideas

To: John Douceur <[email protected]>
Subject: Re: Remailer ideas
From: Rick Busdiecker <[email protected]>
Date: Tue, 09 Aug 1994 00:54:52 -0400
Cc: [email protected]
In-Reply-To: Your message of "Mon, 08 Aug 1994 12:32:32 PDT." <[email protected]>
Organization: Lehman Brothers Inc.
Reply-To: Rick Busdiecker <[email protected]>
Sender: [email protected]

    From: John Douceur <[email protected]>
    Date: Mon,  8 Aug 94 12:32:32 PDT
    Subject: RE: Remailer ideas

    It may thus be quite reasonable to build in a hard cutoff in
    service time . . . since the extreme delay which triggers the
    expedited transmission is an unpredictable and infrequent event

This is not a safe assumption.  Check out the stats for [email protected].

    it will not make cryptanalysis of the remailer any easier.

I'm pretty sure that cryptanalysis, per se, is not the question, but
rather traffic analysis.

			Rick

References:
- RE: Remailer ideas
  - From: John Douceur <[email protected]>

Prev by Date: ANNOUNCE: the TAZONO is here
Next by Date: Re: Remailer ideas
Prev by thread: RE: Remailer ideas
Next by thread: Re: Remailer ideas
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread