[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: Are Remailers Liable for What They Remail?

To: Hal <[email protected]>
Subject: Re: Are Remailers Liable for What They Remail?
From: "Perry E. Metzger" <[email protected]>
Date: Thu, 11 Aug 1994 12:29:31 -0400
Cc: [email protected]
In-Reply-To: Your message of "Thu, 11 Aug 1994 07:48:11 PDT." <[email protected]>
Reply-To: [email protected]
Sender: [email protected]


Hal says:
> This is one of the things that worries me about the Digital
> Telephony bill.  In the various apologias and explanations from EFF,
> CyberWire Dispatch, etc.  about why EFF helped with this bill, it
> was mentioned that online service providers have been removed from
> its coverage because they are not "common carriers".  It only
> applies, they say, to common carriers like phone companies.

UUNET, among others, considers itself to be a common carrier.

Perry

References:
- Re: Are Remailers Liable for What They Remail?
  - From: Hal <[email protected]>

Prev by Date: Schneier apperance update
Next by Date: Re: Are Remailers Liable for What They Remail?
Prev by thread: Re: Are Remailers Liable for What They Remail?
Next by thread: Re: future existence of free remailers?
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread