[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Using PGP on Insecure Machines
> Also importantly, the user interfaces for PGP simply suck as it
> stands, making people like Tim uninterested in going through the
> rigamarole needed to use it on a day to day basis. The real revolution
> isn't going to come until people are able to use PGP and the rest both
> reasonably securely without it being especially noticable that they
> are doing so -- and that is a while off.
At the risk of repeating myself, what's the problem with wrapping PGP in
a shell script? Works for me - see a previous mailing, complete with
wrapper scripts. I can send either encrypted or just signed email
without especially noticing it.
--
Ed Carp, N7EKG [email protected], [email protected]
Finger [email protected] for PGP 2.5 public key [email protected]
If you want magic, let go of your armor. Magic is so much stronger than
steel! -- Richard Bach, "The Bridge Across Forever"