Re: Broadcasts and the Rendezvous Problem

[cactus@seabsd.hks.net (L. Todd Masco)]

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----

In article <v01510103ab114c09dd73@[192.0.2.1]>,
Lucky Green <shamrock@netcom.com> wrote:
>Which brings us back to the news -> mail gateway. There has to be a better
>way.

I don't see a problem.  Broadly put, news is broadcast e-mail.  There are
many sites which in fact do not distinguish between the two, the most
notable of which is CMU's Andrew Message System:  the admins of such
systems believe the "experiment" to be an all-around success.

If you want message A to get from site B to site C without a clear
trail, you've got to broadcast.  It's that simple.  It isn't a very big
problem that site B put something into the flow, so mail to news isn't
a weak point: an article can be injected at the remailer's site without
compromising the channel to traffic analysis.
- -- 
Todd Masco     | It's difficult to be loud about keeping your enumerated
cactus@hks.net | rights when you're busy exercising your unenumerated ones.
cactus@bb.com  |        http://www.hks.net/~cactus/cactus.html
- ---
[This message has been signed by an auto-signing service.  A valid signature
means only that it has been received at the address corresponding to the
signature and forwarded.]

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: 2.6.2
Comment: Gratis auto-signing service

iQBFAwUBLuu/KyoZzwIn1bdtAQHDbwGAgkIM2IZ3W1NtzzgNbpCkjpfJwPMVCMG2
ed0TnOHKU7ws4oUrHpddC6pAjzmk22uO
=2zh3
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----