[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Netcom is not a good example (Was: Re: Files and mail)
Michael Handler <[email protected]> writes:
> Yeah. They only kill accounts when people criticize
> NetCruiser. :-P
> Netcom is hardly an example of a quality service provider.
> They suffer periodic long term news and email delays; their
> service personnel are rude, slow, and unprofessional (read:
> Bruce Woodcock & the above incident);
NetCruiser is a "work in progress" and continues to evolve in the
right direction. Bruce Sterling Woodcock is history. On the
rare occasions when I have interacted with [email protected],
their responses have been both helpful and provided in a timely
> Their security has been compromised countless times
This is Unix. Not a problem exclusive to Netcom.
> They are home to some of the most infamous net.kooks and
> net.cretins (like Tom Servo, currently), ...
I suppose I should be pleased that you have not included me by
name in the list. :)
> Frankly, I'd rather have a Winternet account than a Netcom
Fine with me. As long as *I* don't have to have a Winternet
Mike Duvos $ PGP 2.6 Public Key available $
[email protected] $ via Finger. $