[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: From me to me to you...The Actual Article

Carol Anne Braddock writes:

> This is the article, and what I did with it. It is complete in it's
> entireity, from the bang paths, to the crosspostings. Please study them

> Now, the article,

> Date: Sat, 7 Jan 1995 01:26:26 -0600
> From: Carol Anne Braddock <[email protected]>
> To: [email protected]
> Newsgroups: soc.support.transgendered, alt.transgendered,
>   mn.general, alt.sex.femdom, alt.artcom, alt.sex.bondage, alt.sex,
>   comp.infosystems.www.users, alt.dreams.lucid, alt.dreams 
> Subject: (fwd) Re: Phil Zimmermann

So, I don't read any of those groups, and I could be dead wrong on all
of this. But I'll yap away anyway.

Off the cuff, I'd say your article could be inappropriate. Granted
it's a good cause, and you're not advertising for yourself but for a
charity. However, charitable spam is still spam (and I'm not calling
your article spam... spam lite, maybe). I understand your point about
feeling a sense of community with the above groups; however, I think
that massive "Please help..." postings can be just as annoying as the

					Erik Selberg
"I get by with a little help		[email protected]
 from my friends."			http://www.cs.washington.edu/homes/selberg