[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: ecash remailer
> > perpetrator, let's see... it's Ed. Ed is now charged with theft and
> > has an expensive and uncertain legal experience ahead of him.
> Alice-frames-Ed situation is functionally equivalent to the Bob-robs-Charlie
> situation from the bank's perspective.
I suppose the word "receipt" might be handy to introduce into the entire
scheme. A dispute over who payed & who stole is solved with paperwork of some
sort. Although a digital signature is not necessarily valid (I don't even know
what the Utah Digital Signature Law does) but the bank, as rule-setter
is allowed to say that a digital receipt DOES bind the parties in some