[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: "S1" encryption system (was: this looked like it might be interesting)
George A. Corondan ([email protected]) wrote:
> > >It strikes me as rather foolish to mail off anonymous copies to several
> > >individual recipients (Matt, Perry, Tim, ...) in addition to the list, if
> > >S1 is a real leak. Why aid the traffic analysts by firing off multiple
> > >messages through the remailers ?
> > A third possibility comes to mind, that person or persons associated with
> > the list are using the post to focus on cryptographic efforts in lieu of
> > political or apocalyptic diatribes.
> how about a fourth possibility: the government ___ agency did it.
Can't play that game too much or you'll be in a padded room somewhere,
probably a Federal mental hospital with no name..... ;-)
> this was done to achieve two goals:
> 1) make cypherpunks easy to villify (look at all of the nasty crypto
> stuff being passed to foreign nationals)
> 2) a quick estimate of cypherpunks' ability to analyze an algorithm
I'd say it was trashed in under 5 messages.
> am i being too paranoid? probably, but you tell me :-).
If the algorythim is compiled, supplied with a key and decrypts skipjack
/clipper/bubbaheres then you know it's real.
So you may wonder -- "But what does that have to do with me?"
Answer: I have locked horns with "The Devil", buddy boy,
and compared to him, you ain't sh**.
Brian Francis Redman to Chip Berlet