[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: CYPHERPUNK considered harmful

To: [email protected] (David C. Lambert)
Subject: Re: CYPHERPUNK considered harmful
From: Jeff Barber <[email protected]>
Date: Fri, 15 Sep 1995 17:05:51 -0400 (EDT)
Cc: [email protected]
In-Reply-To: <[email protected]> from "David C. Lambert" at Sep 15, 95 04:13:38 pm
Sender: [email protected]

David C. Lambert writes:

> Peter Trei <[email protected]> wrote:
> 
> >      Terms like 'cypherpunk' and 'cryptoanarchy' tend to pigeonhole us as
> > nutcases for many people, and are a barrier to getting our ideas
> > across.

> Shows you what we're up against.
> 
> BTW, I'm not for changing the name of the list, but I do see the logic
> in a more establishment-friendly name to use when lobbying the public.

How about "civil libertarian" then?


-- Jeff

References:
- Re: CYPHERPUNK considered harmful
  - From: "David C. Lambert" <[email protected]>

Prev by Date: NTSC version BBC-4 show (cryptography/privacy)
Next by Date: Re: Commercial Mixmaster (was Re: Mixmaster status)
Prev by thread: Re: CYPHERPUNK considered harmful
Next by thread: Re: CYPHERPUNK considered harmful
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread