[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: WAS_tem (fwd)
Incoming from Rev. Ben:
>
> On Thu, 14 Sep 1995, James A. Donald wrote:
>
> > If you draw a picture using paintbrush of an underage person engaging
> > in sexual conduct, you are in violation of this proposed legislation.
>
> Doesn't that directly contradict the stated purpose of existing child
[snip]
>
> Do the lawyers on the list want to pipe up?
On cypherpunks?!? Whatever for? I imagine there's already a
rousing discussion going on about this somewhere in AOL. Take it there.
--
"Remember, obsolescence (Win95) isn't an accident; it's an art form!"
[email protected] s. keeling, aecl - whiteshell labs