[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: bit quiet in here lately

At 02:11 AM 11/24/95 -0500, futplex wrote:
>sameer writes:
>> 	I am working on a spec which myself and others will turn into
>> an internet draft, for placements on the standards track.  It will
>> standardize remailer commands and nymserver commands, and will
>> incorporate payment. Once we get a draft written up it will be posted
>> for review, flames, and criticism.
>Great -- I've been toying with working on exactly that since the summer. 
>I never quite convinced myself that a) the general net community would really 
>take a remailer-related i-draft or RFC seriously, or even that b) the
>remailer community would really find a standards document useful. It's
>encouraging to see that some other people also think it's worth writing.

Now, if the remailer service-listing operators could agree on a standard
format for their reporting (lag time, feature lists, etc), then it would
simplify maintaining a list of remailers - which would increase the
usability of the remailer system, and help the use and growth of remailers.

Dave Merriman
This is a test (3 UUE lines) of the unconstitutional ITAR - 1/713th
of the PGP executable. See below for getting YOUR chunk! 
------------------ PGP.ZIP Part [015/713] -------------------
M=$<(&L`#*IPP",(G6(,,S,`P](<2RWU96XCW86/JBYV8A\[email protected]'HB_9H#&\X
M8H,),S$8G>&.WP(8IRA`-M['+`Q%&_C"">5-F%[email protected]<_Q$;*P'',Q$Z/AA[8M
for next chunk to export --> http://dcs.ex.ac.uk/~aba/export/
My web page: http://www.geopages.com/CapitolHill/1148