[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: Cypher secure versus computationally unbounded adversary

To: [email protected]
Subject: Re: Cypher secure versus computationally unbounded adversary
From: [email protected]
Date: Sat, 02 Dec 1995 14:35:58 EST
Cc: [email protected]
In-Reply-To: Your message of "Sat, 02 Dec 1995 14:31:48 EST." <[email protected]>
Sender: [email protected]

What I meant to say, was that the encryption protocol is secure versus
a computationally unbounded passive adversary AND REQUIRES NO PRIOR
COMMUNICATION.

Sorry 'bout that,

Jason W. Solinsky

References:
- Cypher secure versus computationally unbounded adversary
  - From: [email protected]

Prev by Date: Re: Why Netscape employees should not leave...
Next by Date: Re: Netscape GAK page.
Prev by thread: Cypher secure versus computationally unbounded adversary
Next by thread: Re: Cypher secure versus computationally unbounded adversary
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread