Re: Timing Cryptanalysis Attack

["Perry E. Metzger" <perry@piermont.com>]

Matt Blaze writes:
> >The trivial way to handle this is simply to check user time with the
> >right system calls and make sure it always comes out the same with an
> >apropriate number of sleeps.
> 
> Of course, this works against a remote adversary, but not against one
> on the same machine who can look at actual CPU consumption (which doesn't
> increase when the target is blocked).

True enough, but using busy loops could handle that. However, I must
admit to being far more interested in handling the remote case
efficiently, especially given concerns people have about using
Photuris like systems on heavily pounded servers.

Perry