[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Web O Trust, active attacks against same, etc. AGAIN. (was: Usability of Cryptography (was Re: More FUD from First Virtual) )
At 01:39 PM 12/13/95 -0700, Bryce wrote:
>
>-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
>
> An entity calling itself "James A. Donald" <[email protected]>
>allegedly wrote:
>>
>> Web of trust is a mess because it attempts to link keys to
>> physical people, which in general cannot be done.
> *******************************
>
>
>Do you wish to substantiate this rather brazen assertion?
>I am very sure that PGP public key 0xCC56B2E9 belongs to my
>housemate Sebastian Kuzminsky <[email protected]>. Is
>there some reason why I should doubt this belief?
No, but there is some reason you should gain familiarity with
the english language
If I had intended to say "generally cannot be done" I would have
said "generally cannot be done" instead of saying "in general cannot
be done"
---------------------------------------------------------------------
|
We have the right to defend ourselves | http://www.jim.com/jamesd/
and our property, because of the kind |
of animals that we are. True law | James A. Donald
derives from this right, not from the |
arbitrary power of the state. | [email protected]