[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: Political Cleanup program



 
 
Friend, 
 
 
On 12 17 95 [email protected] proposed 
 
    ...a system...that would "blind" campaign donations as to 
    their source:  The donor could be satisfied that his dona- 
    tion gets to the candidate or cause, but the candidate could- 
    n't know  who actually paid the money (and the donor would 
    be unable to prove that he made a donation...). 
 
 
Let's analyse: 
 
A gives B what B wants (money) so that B will give A what A 
  wants (whatever). 
A knows B got the money. 
A can't prove he gave the money to B. 
 
B knows he got the money. 
B can't be sure that A gave the money. 
 
So, depending on time, place, and circumstance; and assum- 
ing B's elected: 
 
     B will not give A what A wants
 
                 OR 
 
     B will give A what A wants 
 
 
For instance, if... 
 
 
  A gives the money but dies before B gets elected. 
 
  A gives the money but gets sent to the Balkans. 
 
  A is a nobody. 
 
 
...B will not give A what A wants. 
 
 
For instance, if... 
 
 
  A gives the money but B's already in debt to him, and the 
    baloon payment's due. 
 
  A gives the money and A's appointed head of an office where 
    B's relatives "work." 
 
  A is the main man in town. 
 
 
...B will give A what A wants. 
 
 
Some things are known by some people whether they're entered 
on the books or not. 
 
I agree with the proposer that his system 
 
    ...would change politics as we know it.
 
 
Flexible corruption is best. 
 
 
Cordially, 
 
Jim