Re: Digital postage and remailer abuse

["David K. Merriman" <merriman@arn.net>]

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----

At 10:47 AM 01/13/96 -0800, Jonathon Blake <grafolog@netcom.com> wrote:
>
>On Sat, 13 Jan 1996, David K. Merriman wrote:
>
>> snailmail; particularly if the remailers were able to issue 'books' of
stamps.
>> It might even be possible to have each remailer issue Estamps (tm) of
>> different 'kinds', much as there are different postage stamp 'themes'.
>
>	I can see it now.  The 1997 Scott Standard Estamp Catalog:  
>	Remailers of the World.  
>
Or perhaps Famous Cypherpunks?

So maybe a bad example, but the analogy is quasi-valid :-)

>> Having different stamps from each remailer would also allow some means of
>> tracking spammers and rip-off artists ("hmmm. an 'Elvis' Estamp. That came
>> from hactic; let's see if they can tell us who they sold this book to.....")
>
>	OTOH, if hactic keeps records of who the stamps are sold to,
>	that sort of defeats the anonymous nature of the remailers.
>

Perhaps a little, but considering *why* Estamps would be used, I think it
would be an acceptable 'hazard'. Of course, it's not any kind of
requirement, simply a means of resolving a *significant* problem. Or not. :-)

Dave


-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: 2.6.2

iQCVAwUBMPc9h8VrTvyYOzAZAQHl0wP+LY/Lw9EzM8kH5Eyr7rLRzEFwKSmWIeTf
sElMTzxQbTyqXrmzI0nB43Dmx1Cpkb+8mSCFVnXwvZDQzrP8cFidYGlNF/hG00ig
d16+D6Le07YgO65pCngNhv11CLKtd/1GZf4r8YXZV7zbMcbslooUHt/mVWkl5zGT
AP0ssH0WAI4=
=TQ04
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
-------------------------------------------------------------
"It is not the function of our Government to keep the citizen
from falling into error; it is the function of the citizen to
keep the Government from falling into error."
Robert H. Jackson (1892-1954), U.S. Judge
<><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><>
My web page: http://www.geocities.com/CapitolHill/1148