[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: "Nations see Internet.." continued



On Sun, 4 Feb 1996, Mike Ang wrote:

> 
> Comparing crypto to guns works in the sense that the "bad guys" will 
> always be able to have access to them.  However, I for one support gun 
> control but do not support mandatory limits on crypto.  Where I live,
> there are no theats that justify allowing everyone to carry guns 
>
	well, I'll tell you what, we'll export 10,000 of our inner city 
    gang members north; then you think about leaving _all_ weapons in
    the hands of the central state who increasingly is failing to provide 
    adequate protection for the weak members of its society.

>- the 
> threat to privacy and freedom of speech justifies allowing everyone to 
> use strong crypto.  You can use a gun to deprive another person of their 
> life - what harm can you do another with PGP?  Perhaps you can harm them 
> by being able to spread hate propaganda, but I don't think that that is a 
> strong enough argument.
> 
> 	- Mike.
> 
> If you've got to flame me, do it by email.
> 

__________________________________________________________________________
    go not unto usenet for advice, for the inhabitants thereof will say:
      yes, and no, and maybe, and I don't know, and fuck-off.
_________________________________________________________________ attila__

    To be a ruler of men, you need at least 12 inches....
    There is no safety this side of the grave.  Never was; never will be.