Re: Defeating untrustworthy remailers?

[zinc <zinc@zifi.genetics.utah.edu>]

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----

On Wed, 7 Feb 1996, Deranged Mutant wrote:
 
> On Wed, 7 Feb 1996, Deranged Mutant wrote:
> 
> Date: Wed, 7 Feb 1996 00:21:58 -0500
> From: Deranged Mutant <wlkngowl@unix.asb.com>
> To: cypherpunks@toad.com
> Subject: Defeating untrustworthy remailers?
> 
> Here's another idea (don't laugh): to set up a system where mailing
> lists and newsgroups have public keys that you can encrypt directly to.
> Advantage for anonymous mail is that if a remailer is untrustowrthy,
> there's still some security in the final remailing of the document.
> 
> Furthermore, non-encrypted mail is less at risk of tampering. And some
> newsgroups or lists could requires a signed message from an approved
> key before posting.
> 
> there is no reason to laugh at this.  there is already a mailing list 
> where all traffic is encrypted using either the remailer's public key or 
> the going the other way, the users public key.  it's John Perry's 
> cypher-list.
> 
> -pjf
> 
> 
> "Those that give up essential liberty to obtain a little temporary
>  safety deserve neither liberty nor safety." -- Benjamin Franklin (1773)
> 			  finger for PGP key
> zifi runs LINUX 1.3.57 -=-=-=WEB=-=-=->  http://zifi.genetics.utah.edu 
> 




"Those that give up essential liberty to obtain a little temporary
 safety deserve neither liberty nor safety." -- Benjamin Franklin (1773)
			  finger for PGP key
zifi runs LINUX 1.3.57 -=-=-=WEB=-=-=->  http://zifi.genetics.utah.edu 

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: 2.6.2
Comment: Processed by mkpgp1.6, a Pine/PGP interface.

iQCVAwUBMRhDXk3Qo/lG0AH5AQHGRAP+PlD1lbYr0nJRyrKO7Q7i8MCdA+msLpZL
Sh9H2zXLI8trLFFxDKPw+XNjCa8X999PgceuLaDS2TdxmesUqsoxusZOh+ce3PuM
vjiOpY/bFpsrS4ObF5IswjVZQNnYPZL5AD8VAu1hwwRBg9WiMVM9oqiQF5JF49pl
ZpNcfaETn2g=
=abHX
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----