[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: FV's blatant double standards

To: [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected]
Subject: Re: FV's blatant double standards
From: "Simson L. Garfinkel" <[email protected]>
Date: Mon, 5 Feb 1996 20:39:42 -0500 (EST)
Sender: [email protected]

Yes, clearly if you are not concerned about missing 50-75% of First Virtual's 
users, this attack will work just fine.
-simson

Follow-Ups:
- How would an FV attack fail? (was: Re: FV's blatant double standards)
  - From: [email protected] (Roy M. Silvernail)

Prev by Date: paper on remailers in the intelligence community
Next by Date: Re: Reasons in support of crypto-anarchy WAS Re: Why am I wrong?
Prev by thread: Re: FV's blatant double standards
Next by thread: How would an FV attack fail? (was: Re: FV's blatant double standards)
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread