Re: violating politicians privacy

[attila <attila@primenet.com>]

On Thu, 8 Feb 1996, Bill Stewart wrote:

> attila said:
>
> >	well, I take it as assumed correct that illegally violating the
> >    credit and personal information of member os Congress (might as well 
> >    include the Clintons and the Gores) would get a response on privacy.
> 
> _Is_ it violating their privacy to get their credit information?
> After all, they're applying for some mighty big loans from everybody,
> and putting everybody who pays US taxes down as a credit reference....
>
    attila writes: 

        well, remember, Congress has a prime function that their "duty" 
    is to legislate a bunch of laws for _us_ to live buy; and, that being 
    done, to legislate a second set of laws, more to their liking, for
    _them_ to live by and collect $5M pensions, and 100% health coverage
    at the very best for the rest of their lifes. 

__________________________________________________________________________
    go not unto usenet for advice, for the inhabitants thereof will say:
      yes, and no, and maybe, and I don't know, and fuck-off.
_________________________________________________________________ attila__

    To be a ruler of men, you need at least 12 inches....
    There is no safety this side of the grave.  Never was; never will be.